A limiting dilution assay (* p,0.05 when compared to control group) (n = 5), three days after interruption of treatment. Two independent experiments were done and the results were analyzed with SigmaStatH Program. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051864.gTests against MedChemExpress JNJ-7706621 intracellular amastigotes are more relevant to infer the sensitivity of anti- leishmanial drugs, since this is the parasite stage found in the vertebrate host [26]. In the present study, no significant differences were observed regarding the sensitivity of the different Leishmania species to each tested compound. In intracellular amastigote assays, the TPM compounds JNJ-7706621 site presented an IC50 between 0.10 mM and 1.59 mM for L. (L.) amazonensis and between 0.10 mM and 1.53 mM for L. (V.) braziliensis. MoraisTeixeira et al. [27], using the same methodology for intracellular amastigote assays described for GlucantimeTM, the first choice drug in CL treatment, an IC50 of 22.9 mg/mL (188.07 mM) for L. (L.) amazonensis and 24.2 mg/mL (198.75 mM) for L. (V.) braziliensis. Thus, the TPM compounds were between 10?00 fold more potent against Leishmania than the current standard of care. Moreover, based on the cytotoxicity data, the selectivity index could also be estimated. It is generally considered that biological efficacy is not due to in vitro cytotoxicity, when this index is 10 [28], as it was observed for TPM 1, TPM 6, TPM 9 and GV against L. (L.) amazonensis and TPM 1, TPM 6 and TPM 9 against L. (V.) braziliensis. Two mechanisms of action have been ascribed to TPM. An initial study from our laboratory has shown that TPM are potent inhibitors of NADPH oxidase [29]. A second study of ours demonstrated that TPM, but not other NADPH oxidases, also localize in mitochondria and form covalent adducts with thioredoxin 2 (Trx2) [30]. We believe that the first mechanism can be excluded for direct activity against Leishmania, as compounds that were inactive against Leishmania species show potent NADPH oxidase inhibitory activity, namely the compounds with larger aromatic substituent. The possible role of Trx2 as a target for Leishmania is particularly attractive given a recent report of the role of Trx2 in malaria parasite survival, and may provide an explanation of the activity of TPM against both promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania [31]. Among the TPM compounds, TPM6, TPM 9 and GV demonstrated the highest selectivity indexes (Table 3). Inagreement to the findings observed on the in vitro assays, both TPM 6 and GV showed high activity against parasites in vivo. TPM 6 decreased the parasite burdens by three orders of magnitude, while the 1 GV gel promoted complete elimination of parasites in treated animals. In a dose-response experiment with GV gel, a linear dose dependent response was not observed, but again complete elimination of parasite burden was observed in animals treated with the GV gel at 1 . Similar results were observed in preliminary experiments in L. (V.) braziliensis infected hamsters (data not shown). Limitations of this study may include the use of an extreme susceptible experimental model and the lack of an extended period to follow up lesions healing. It is noteworthy that previous data have indicated that intramuscular administration of Glucantime, at doses equivalent to those used in human chemotherapy, to either hamsters infected L. (V.) braziliensis or BALB/c mice infected with 12926553 L. (L.) amazonensis did not lead to significant reductions in lesions size [15]. Similar fin.A limiting dilution assay (* p,0.05 when compared to control group) (n = 5), three days after interruption of treatment. Two independent experiments were done and the results were analyzed with SigmaStatH Program. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051864.gTests against intracellular amastigotes are more relevant to infer the sensitivity of anti- leishmanial drugs, since this is the parasite stage found in the vertebrate host [26]. In the present study, no significant differences were observed regarding the sensitivity of the different Leishmania species to each tested compound. In intracellular amastigote assays, the TPM compounds presented an IC50 between 0.10 mM and 1.59 mM for L. (L.) amazonensis and between 0.10 mM and 1.53 mM for L. (V.) braziliensis. MoraisTeixeira et al. [27], using the same methodology for intracellular amastigote assays described for GlucantimeTM, the first choice drug in CL treatment, an IC50 of 22.9 mg/mL (188.07 mM) for L. (L.) amazonensis and 24.2 mg/mL (198.75 mM) for L. (V.) braziliensis. Thus, the TPM compounds were between 10?00 fold more potent against Leishmania than the current standard of care. Moreover, based on the cytotoxicity data, the selectivity index could also be estimated. It is generally considered that biological efficacy is not due to in vitro cytotoxicity, when this index is 10 [28], as it was observed for TPM 1, TPM 6, TPM 9 and GV against L. (L.) amazonensis and TPM 1, TPM 6 and TPM 9 against L. (V.) braziliensis. Two mechanisms of action have been ascribed to TPM. An initial study from our laboratory has shown that TPM are potent inhibitors of NADPH oxidase [29]. A second study of ours demonstrated that TPM, but not other NADPH oxidases, also localize in mitochondria and form covalent adducts with thioredoxin 2 (Trx2) [30]. We believe that the first mechanism can be excluded for direct activity against Leishmania, as compounds that were inactive against Leishmania species show potent NADPH oxidase inhibitory activity, namely the compounds with larger aromatic substituent. The possible role of Trx2 as a target for Leishmania is particularly attractive given a recent report of the role of Trx2 in malaria parasite survival, and may provide an explanation of the activity of TPM against both promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania [31]. Among the TPM compounds, TPM6, TPM 9 and GV demonstrated the highest selectivity indexes (Table 3). Inagreement to the findings observed on the in vitro assays, both TPM 6 and GV showed high activity against parasites in vivo. TPM 6 decreased the parasite burdens by three orders of magnitude, while the 1 GV gel promoted complete elimination of parasites in treated animals. In a dose-response experiment with GV gel, a linear dose dependent response was not observed, but again complete elimination of parasite burden was observed in animals treated with the GV gel at 1 . Similar results were observed in preliminary experiments in L. (V.) braziliensis infected hamsters (data not shown). Limitations of this study may include the use of an extreme susceptible experimental model and the lack of an extended period to follow up lesions healing. It is noteworthy that previous data have indicated that intramuscular administration of Glucantime, at doses equivalent to those used in human chemotherapy, to either hamsters infected L. (V.) braziliensis or BALB/c mice infected with 12926553 L. (L.) amazonensis did not lead to significant reductions in lesions size [15]. Similar fin.