Lies around the time donated by clinical employees. Though our respondents admired this, five participants pointed out that it also impacted on programme delivery. One example is, numerous mentioned they had not been approached to take element in the MMP until their youngster was nicely into their RT treatment, and would have appreciated the potential to begin the programme earlier. Yet another described how the length of time their child participated in the programme was also brief, and that the benefits on the programme would have already been maximised if participation had been longer. Two parents also mentioned there had been a month delay just before they received the completed personalised movie, and felt that Sakuranetin In Vitro getting the final film throughout the last stages of treatment would have enabled the youngster to share their experiences with school buddies. Despite the fact that these comments were not widespread, they nonetheless highlight the incredibly apparent part of funding in helpful programme delivery.26 With the MMP, the root lead to on the difficulties identified by our interviewees was the lack of time that staff could deliver to theShrimpton BJM, Willis DJ, Tongs CD, et al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001666. doi:ten.1136bmjopen-2012-Movie making as a cognitive distraction for paediatric radiotherapy individuals programme. Certainly, when novel programmes just like the MMP may be valued by hospital administration for their contribution to supportive care, 
patient satisfaction with services as well as for producing good publicity, without appropriate funding they run the risk of becoming ad hoc activities, or, to PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21330346 finish abruptly when essential employees move on. A important challenge then for the MMP, and comparable innovative psychosocial programmes, would be to establish a safe funding base as without it sustainability is questionable, plus the rewards to patients’ risk being lost. Study strengths and limitations The strengths of this study reflect these of qualitative research in general. These incorporate that as an alternative to responding to preconceived outcome categories, participants outlined what they perceived to be the rewards from the programme freely. Applying open-ended concerns also enabled us to create exceptionally rich, detailed and unexpected information concerning participant views and experiences of the MMP. In addition, the capacity to use prompts and probes in the course of interviews provided possibilities to discover the how and why of participant responses.27 Finally, the impartiality in the benefits was enhanced by way of the study getting undertaken by an independent evaluation centre with no institutional affiliation together with the radiation treatment unit. In the similar time, the study clearly includes a variety of limitations. The very first of these is the fact that we’ve got relied on the perspectives of parents and haven’t also incorporated paediatric patients. This selection was produced in portion as a result of young age of some programme participants, but principally to prevent the possibility of causing an particularly vulnerable group further distress. Moreover, we recruited study participants whose kids had favourable outcomes following cancer treatment. This was a deliberate option so as not to contribute towards the anguish or sorrow of parents whose youngster was critically unwell or no longer alive. We
^^Open AccessResearchLiving with HIV postdiagnosis: a qualitative study with the experiences of Nairobi slum residentsEliud Wekesa,1 Ernestina CoastTo cite: Wekesa E, Coast E. Living with HIV postdiagnosis: a qualitative study on the experiences of Nairobi slum residents. BMJ Open 2013;3:.