Nded ponding depth is 505 mm, and 1000600 mm water is applied as 155 irrigations during a particular season. In this study, the ponding water is applied as 155 irrigations in the course of a specific season. Within this study, the ponding depth was 60 mm, and 116 irrigations had been applied through baseline. Khaliq et al. [11] depth was 60 mm, and 116 irrigations have been applied in the course of the the baseline. Khaliq et al. [11] and Gaydon [23] [23] applied 16 irrigations, every single 60 mm in depth, to represent the and Gaydon et al.et al. also also applied 16 irrigations, each 60 mm in depth, to represent the present rice farming practices in Punjab. A detailed comparison of CROPWAT outcurrent rice farming practices in Punjab. A detailed comparison of CROPWAT outcomes in comes in together with the with all the literature can also be provided in Supplementary Table S3 S1. this studythis studyliterature is also offered in Supplementary Table S3 and Figureand Figure S1. The comparison recommended that the simulation represent the present field-scale The comparison recommended that the simulation benefits PF-05105679 Neuronal Signaling fairly benefits pretty represent the present field-scale irrigation practices in Punjab, Pakistan. irrigation practices in Punjab, Pakistan.three.three. Projected Wheat Irrigation Schedules We projected several parameters that govern thethe future irrigation water manageWe projected various parameters that govern future irrigation water management of wheat,wheat, including othe ETER, PIWR, NIWR, N, and quantity of irrigations. Figure five ment of including the ET , Etc , o, And so on, ER, PIWR, NIWR, N, and quantity of irrigations. presents the meanthe imply andvariations in the above parameters through the baseline Figure 5 presents and median median variations of the above parameters through the and future time slices, as well as the right-hand side panels show the variations relative to baseline and future time slices, as well as the right-hand side panels show the variations relative thethe respective baseline typical values. TheMK test Z-scores and Sen’s slope in the to respective baseline typical values. The MK test Z-scores and Sen’s slope with the interseasonal trends with the parameters are supplied in Figure six and Table 2, Immune Checkpoint Proteins Biological Activity respectively. interseasonal trends of the parameters are offered in Figure six and Table 2, respectively. For the duration of the baseline, the average wheat seasonal EToo,, And so on , ER, PIWR, NIWR, and N were In the course of the baseline, the typical wheat seasonal ET And so on, ER, PIWR, NIWR, and N had been 400 mm, 235 mm, 130 mm, 150 mm, 180 mm, and 1616 days, respectively. On typical, 400 mm, 235 mm, 130 mm, 150 mm, 180 mm, and days, respectively. On typical, two.four two.four irrigations have been applied through the baseline wheat season. irrigations were applied in the course of the baseline wheat season.Figure five. Wheat seasonal (November pril) cumulative (a) reference evapotranspiration (ETo ), (b)(b) crop evapotranspiraFigure five. Wheat seasonal (November pril) cumulative (a) reference evapotranspiration (ETo), crop evapotranspiration (And so forth ), (c)), (c) effective rainfall (ER), (d) possible irrigation water requirement (PIWR), (e) net irrigationwater requirement tion (And so on effective rainfall (ER), (d) potential irrigation water requirement (PIWR), (e) net irrigation water requirement (NIWR), (f) variety of irrigations, and (g) quantity rainy days (N) during the baseline (1980010), 2030s, (2021050) and (NIWR), (f) quantity of irrigations, and (g) number of of rainy days (N) for the duration of the baseline (1980-2010), 2030s, (2021-2050) and 2060s (2051-2080). 2060s (2051080).