Tion. (c,d) show peaks of of phyllic rgillic alteration minerals.The XRD in (e) shows argillic The XRD of (a,b) show peaks of of phyllic alteration. (c,d) show peaks phyllic rgillic alteration minerals. (d) S19, (e)in (e) shows and (g) S16 Figure 13. The XRD evaluation of (a) the S04, (b) S07, (c) S13, S21, (f) S14, alteration. The peaks in (f,g) samples. that N-Desmethyl Sildenafil manufacturer samples S14 and S16 have been show peaks of phyllic alteration. (c) The C/S signifies indicate The XRD benefits of (a)S16 werecollected from propylitic alteration. and (d) show peaks of argillic alteration. The peaks in (f,g) indicate that samples S14 and and (b) collected from propylitic alteration. The C/S suggests Count per second is y title and 2 could be the x title. 2 phyllic rgillic alteration minerals. The XRD in (e) shows argillic alteration. The peaks in (f) and (g)6. Accuracy Assessment 5.2. Geochemical Evaluation and two will be the x title. per second is y title To evaluate the performances from the on all 21 SAM strategies, classification ICP-MS and XRF analyses had been performed SVM and samples taken in the studyresults wereGeochemicalwithof the S04 sample showed enrichment ofDP results that integrated the five.2. compared Evaluation DP outcomes. In this comparison, the Au (104 ppb), As (289 regions. The ICP-MS analysis the ppm), alteration of phyllite, argillic, propylitic, and iron oxides were made use of as ground truth. User Cu (467 ppm),and XRF (21 ppm) were performed on all 21 samples Inside the ICP-MS study ICP-MS and Mo analyses components (Appendix A, Table A1). taken in the resultsaccuracy, producer accuracy, in the S04 sampleand kappa 3014 ppm)of Auobservable As (289 of S06 The ICP-MS evaluation general accuracy, (1195 and coefficient [70,71] have been calculated regions. and S07 samples, the Zn enrichment showed enrichment was (104 ppb), to evaluate accuracy of the sample, Mn (3464 ppm), a total accuracy of Au and 67.two (Appendix A, Cu the A1). Within the S09 final results. The outcomes showedCu (198 Table A1). 84.4the ICP-MS ppm), Table ppm), and Mo (21 ppm) elements (Appendix, ppm) and In (60 (467 for SVM and SAM, respectively. The worth of your kappa coefficient for SVM was 0.74 and ppb) showed enrichment (Appendix A, the ZnA1). The ICP-MS outcomes of your S11was observable benefits of S06 and S07 samples, Table enrichment (1195 and 3014 ppm) sample for SAM it was 0.52. As may be noticed from Tables 1 and two, the classification of the phyllic, evaluation showed Mn (1664 ppm) the S09 sample, Mn (3464 ppm), Cu (198 ppm) and Au (60 ppb) (Appendix, Table A1). In enrichment (Appendix A, Table A1). Pb (280 ppm) and argillic, and propylitic alteration final results of the SVM strategy had been more precise, but the Cu (509showed enrichment (Appendix, Table A1). wereICP-MS final results with the S11of Figure ppm) enrichment in the kind of malachite The VU0359595 web observed at the place sample analysis Fe-oxides alteration result on the SAM classification was more constant with ground truth. 11e, from which Mn S21 sample was collected (Appendix Table A1). PbThe XRF analysisCu (509 showed the (1664 ppm) enrichment (Appendix, A, Table A1). (280 ppm) and also the very best outcome was inside the classification of propylitic alteration in the SVM strategy. was performed for all samples; the results are shown in Appendixat the place of Figure 11e, ppm) enrichment inside the kind of malachite had been observed A, Table A2. Altered samples showed high amounts of Al2was collected (Appendix,SiO2 (41.42 up to 56.24 ), from which the S21 sample O3 (17.00 up to 24.20 ), Table A1). The XRF evaluation was.